[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ad818b10110c4c383afbc2c39235a4f7f17f4c7.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:18:05 +0100
From: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
nguyenb@...eaurora.org, hongwus@...eaurora.org,
ziqichen@...eaurora.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
saravanak@...gle.com, salyzyn@...gle.com
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@...eaurora.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs: Protect PM ops and err_handler from user
access through sysfs
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 05:59 -0800, Can Guo wrote:
> + * @shutting_down: flag to check if shutdown has been invoked
> + * @host_sem: semaphore used to serialize concurrent contexts
> * @eh_wq: Workqueue that eh_work works on
> * @eh_work: Worker to handle UFS errors that require s/w attention
> * @eeh_work: Worker to handle exception events
> @@ -751,7 +753,8 @@ struct ufs_hba {
> u32 intr_mask;
> u16 ee_ctrl_mask;
> bool is_powered;
> - struct semaphore eh_sem;
> + bool shutting_down;
> + struct semaphore host_sem;
>
> /* Work Queues */
> struct workqueue_struct *eh_wq;
> @@ -875,6 +878,11 @@ static inline bool ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(struct
> ufs_hba *hba)
> return hba->caps & UFSHCD_CAP_WB_EN;
> }
>
> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_sysfs_allowed(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> + return !hba->shutting_down;
> +}
> +
Can,
Instead adding new shutting_down flag, can we use availible variable
system_state?
Thanks,
Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists