[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210110051502.GX2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 21:15:02 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 01:24:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commit
>
> cffdc9c7c24c ("EXP sched: Print list of runnable tasks in the current rq")
>
> is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>
> Paul, remember the rules for -next:
>
> You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
> been:
> * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
> Signed-off-by,
> * posted to the relevant mailing list,
> * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
> * successfully unit tested, and
> * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.
>
> Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
> to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.
Please accept my apologies for my messing this up.
Valentin, may I apply your Signed-off-by? Otherwise, I am liable to
again get it into -next where it is not yet ready to go. But without it,
rcutorture gets noise from 12e08bc4d ("sched/hotplug: Consolidate task
migration on CPU unplug") that is otherwise difficult to diagnose. :-/
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists