linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kbuild: Fix section reference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ-d-9VSLdS9SLM9_cjUrL3tvLXndiFw124c_qic2vh5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:16:32 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: kbuild: Fix section reference

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:42 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Section 3.11 was incorrectly called 3.9, fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst | 2 +-


Applied to linux-kbuild. Thanks.


>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst b/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst
> index d36768cf1250..9f6a11881951 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.rst
> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ more details, with real examples.
>         explicitly added to $(targets).
>
>         Assignments to $(targets) are without $(obj)/ prefix. if_changed may be
> -       used in conjunction with custom rules as defined in "3.9 Custom Rules".
> +       used in conjunction with custom rules as defined in "3.11 Custom Rules".
>
>         Note: It is a typical mistake to forget the FORCE prerequisite.
>         Another common pitfall is that whitespace is sometimes significant; for
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
>


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada