lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 07:21:13 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> Cc: Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>, Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>, Krzysztof Adamski <krzysztof.adamski@...ia.com>, Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.osdn.me>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>, Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>, Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>, Koen Vandeputte <koen.vandeputte@...ntric.com>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>, Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>, Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> Subject: Re: Old platforms: bring out your dead On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 10:52:53PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: (... i486 ...) > As with the other older platforms, the main question to ask is: > Are there users that are better off running a future LTS kernel on this > hardware than the v5.10.y version or something older? I think this is the most important part of the question. Because the possible use case I've described actually doesn't correspond to a "prod" machine but to a machine that's powered on every 5 years for some old data recovery. In such a case users just start with an old system (possibly the one that's still on them if present), and this doesn't warrant an up-to-date OS. Moreover, just as I experienced when maintaining 2.4, there's a point where support for old stuff starts to break again by lack of testing. And just because of this, users shouldn't always expect to see their old machines boot fine on a recent kernel. Sometimes there may even be difficulties setting up a compatible toolchain. So actually the question shouldn't be "does anyone want such old machines to still be supported" but "does anyone *need* them to be supported". And I suspect that for most of them the response is "no", it's just a convenience. Just my two cents, Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists