[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/qf5rpxjLxSd3iq@google.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 22:34:14 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Arthur Demchenkov <spinal.by@...il.com>,
Carl Philipp Klemm <philipp@...s.xyz>,
Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@...zup.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, ruleh <ruleh@....de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Input: omap4-keypad - use PM runtime to check keys
for errata
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:58:21PM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> @@ -301,6 +348,7 @@ static int omap4_keypad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> keypad_data->irq = irq;
> + mutex_init(&keypad_data->lock);
>
> error = omap4_keypad_parse_dt(&pdev->dev, keypad_data);
> if (error)
> @@ -320,6 +368,8 @@ static int omap4_keypad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_release_mem;
> }
>
> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, OMAP4_KEYPAD_AUTOIDLE_MS);
This, and corresponding changes in open() and close() seem like a
separate improvement. Do you mind splitting them into a separate patch,
and have the missing key release fix go on top of it?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists