[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/xa1WBqu8ZOl5QD@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:04:05 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
vincent.donnefort@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/debug: Add new tracepoint to track cpu_capacity
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 06:26:42PM +0000, Qais Yousef wrote:
> So I have a proper patch for that now, that actually turned out to be really
> tiny once you untangle exactly what is missing.
>
> Peter, bpf programs aren't considered ABIs AFAIK, do you have concerns about
> that?
In order to use these you need to rely on BTF to get anything useful
done right? And anything that relies on BTF cannot be ABI.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists