[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111142402.6euyktmcnpemanf7@box>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:24:02 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Create 'old' ptes for faultaround mappings on
arm64 with hardware access flag
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 11:34:08AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I still dislike how we basically randomly modify the information in
> that 'vmf' thing.
I wounder if it would be acceptable to pass down to faultaround a copy
of vmf, so it mess with it without risking to corrupt the original one?
We would need to transfer back prealloc_pte, but the rest can be safely
discarded, I believe.
But it's somewhat wasteful of stack. sizeof(vmf) == 96 on x86-64.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists