[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210111152638.2417-7-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 23:26:36 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH -tip V4 6/8] workqueue: use wq_unbound_online_cpumask in restore_unbound_workers_cpumask()
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() is called when CPU_ONLINE, where
wq_online_cpumask equals to cpu_online_mask. So no fucntionality
changed.
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index d01cca8e51f9..f2793749bd97 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5043,6 +5043,7 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
static cpumask_t cpumask;
struct worker *worker;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_attach_mutex);
/* is @cpu allowed for @pool? */
@@ -5050,7 +5051,7 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
return;
/* is @cpu the only online CPU? */
- cpumask_and(&cpumask, pool->attrs->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+ cpumask_and(&cpumask, pool->attrs->cpumask, wq_unbound_online_cpumask);
if (cpumask_weight(&cpumask) != 1)
return;
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists