linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/cpufeatures: Add low performance CRC32C instruction CPU feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A96ECD10-F51F-408C-80DF-5937DF43D314@zytor.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:20:25 -0800
From:   hpa@...or.com
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
CC:     herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
        tony.luck@...el.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        kyung.min.park@...el.com, kim.phillips@....com,
        mgross@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com, liam.merwick@...cle.com,
        mlevitsk@...hat.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com, babu.moger@....com,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        TimGuo-oc@...oxin.com, CooperYan@...oxin.com,
        QiyuanWang@...oxin.com, HerryYang@...oxin.com,
        CobeChen@...oxin.com, SilviaZhao@...oxin.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] x86/cpufeatures: Add low performance CRC32C instruction CPU feature

On January 6, 2021 10:37:50 PM PST, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:19:06PM +0800, Tony W Wang-oc wrote:
>> SSE4.2 on Zhaoxin CPUs are compatible with Intel. The presence of
>> CRC32C instruction is enumerated by CPUID.01H:ECX.SSE4_2[bit 20] = 1.
>> Some Zhaoxin CPUs declare support SSE4.2 instruction sets but their
>> CRC32C instruction are working with low performance.
>> 
>> Add a synthetic CPU flag to indicates that the CRC32C instruction is
>> not working as intended. This low performance CRC32C instruction flag
>> is depend on X86_FEATURE_XMM4_2.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tony W Wang-oc <TonyWWang-oc@...oxin.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c   | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>> index 84b8878..9e8151b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
>> @@ -292,6 +292,7 @@
>>  #define X86_FEATURE_FENCE_SWAPGS_KERNEL	(11*32+ 5) /* "" LFENCE in
>kernel entry SWAPGS path */
>>  #define X86_FEATURE_SPLIT_LOCK_DETECT	(11*32+ 6) /* #AC for split
>lock */
>>  #define X86_FEATURE_PER_THREAD_MBA	(11*32+ 7) /* "" Per-thread
>Memory Bandwidth Allocation */
>> +#define X86_FEATURE_CRC32C		(11*32+ 8) /* "" Low performance CRC32C
>instruction */
>
>Didn't hpa say to create a BUG flag for it - X86_BUG...? Low
>performance
>insn sounds like a bug and not a feature to me.
>
>And call it X86_BUG_CRC32C_SLOW or ..._UNUSABLE to denote what it
>means.
>
>Thx.

Yes, it should be a BUG due to the inclusion properties of BUG v FEATURE.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.