linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] ASoC: soc-pcm: Fix uninitialised return value in variable ret

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02666c81-5b0b-fe48-5d9d-63f2f007bfba@canonical.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:07:46 +0000
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        朱灿灿 <zhucancan@...o.com>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ASoC: soc-pcm: Fix uninitialised return value in
 variable ret

On 11/01/2021 16:35, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:35:46PM +0000, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> Currently when attempting to start the BE fails because the
>> FE is not started the error return variable ret is not initialized
>> and garbage is returned.  Fix this by setting it to 0 so the
> 
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
> 
Just to double-check, which tree should I be working against?

Colin