[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111172259.GZ4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:22:59 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wesley Zhao <zhaowei1102@...ndersoft.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, kerneldev@...smulder.nl, nivedita@...m.mit.edu,
joe@...ches.com, gpiccoli@...onical.com, aquini@...hat.com,
gustavoars@...nel.org, ojeda@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...ogle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, david@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, guohanjun@...wei.com,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lib/cmdline: add new function get_option_ull()
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 08:33:17AM -0800, Wesley Zhao wrote:
> From: "Wesley.Zhao" <zhaowei1102@...ndersoft.com>
>
> In the future we would pass the unsigned long long parameter
> like(0x123456781234) in cmdline on the 64bit platform, so add a new
> option parse function get_option_ull()
No negative numbers?
No test cases?
No user?
Please, address above.
Besides that, consider to deduplicate (like it's done in simple_strto*() family
of functions), so we don't have two implementation that are basically do the
same, only put result to a different type of variable.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists