[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210111172839.640914-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:28:39 +0000
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] seccomp: Add missing return in non-void function
We don't actually care about the value, since the kernel will panic
before that; but a value should nonetheless be returned, otherwise the
compiler will complain.
Fixes: 8112c4f140fa ("seccomp: remove 2-phase API")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.7+
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
---
kernel/seccomp.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 952dc1c90229..63b40d12896b 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1284,6 +1284,8 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
BUG();
+
+ return -1;
}
#endif
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists