[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a056f28e-bbdc-1400-83f2-b6d76afd92b9@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:44:17 +0000
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
CC: <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>, <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
<corbet@....net>, <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<intel-linux-scu@...el.com>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas and users: Remove notifier indirection
On 11/01/2021 17:41, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:28:32AM +0800, John Garry wrote:
> ...
>> index a920eced92ec..6a51abdc59ae 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c
>> @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static void mvs_bytes_dmaed(struct mvs_info *mvi, int i)
>> }
>>
>> sas_ha = mvi->sas;
>> - sas_ha->notify_phy_event(sas_phy, PHYE_OOB_DONE);
>> + sas_notify_phy_event(sas_phy, PHYE_OOB_DONE);
>>
>
> Minor point: "sas_ha" is now not used anywhere; it should be removed.
> .
>
ah, yes, it can be removed.
BTW, on separate topic, did intel-linux-scu@...el.com bounce for you?
Thanks,
John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists