[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4158afa4-d28d-baf6-e26e-ef0e349d0596@somainline.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:43:47 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, martin.botka@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] regulator: qcom-labibb: Implement voltage selector
ops
Il 11/01/21 14:16, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 02:29:15PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>
>> + .linear_ranges = (struct linear_range[]) {
>> + REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(4600000, 0, 15, 100000),
>> + },
>> + .n_linear_ranges = 1,
>
> If there's a single range that's just a simple linear mapping and should
> use regulator_map_voltage_linear().
>
Yeah... that's.. my brain playing jokes on me, I think...
Thank you, will fix in V2!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists