Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:31:11 -0800
From:   Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@...kylinos.cn>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V

On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:51 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:02:19 PST (-0800), atishp@...shpatra.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:39 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> >> code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> >> it again.
> >>
> >> RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> >> modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >>
> >> This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> >> It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> >> This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> >> as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> >> maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> >> I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> >>
> >> # numactl --hardware
> >> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> >> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> >> node 0 size: 486 MB
> >> node 0 free: 470 MB
> >> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> >> node 1 size: 424 MB
> >> node 1 free: 408 MB
> >> node distances:
> >> node   0   1
> >>   0:  10  20
> >>   1:  20  10
> >> # numactl -show
> >> policy: default
> >> preferred node: current
> >> physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> >> cpubind: 0 1
> >> nodebind: 0 1
> >> membind: 0 1
> >>
> >> The patches are also available at
> >> https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.11_numa_unified_v5
> >>
> >> For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >>
> >> Testing:
> >> RISC-V:
> >> Tested in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >>
> >> ARM64:
> >> 2 socket kunpeng920 (4 nodes around 250G a node)
> >> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> >>
> >> Changes from v4->v5:
> >> 1. Added by Acked-by & Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Swapped patch 1 & 2 in v4 version.
> >>
> >> Changes from v3->v4:
> >> 1. Removed redundant duplicate header.
> >> 2. Added Reviewed-by tags.
> >>
> >> Changes from v2->v3:
> >> 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
> >> 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
> >>
> >> Changes from v1->v2:
> >> 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
> >> 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
> >> 3. Fixed few typos.
> >>
> >> Atish Patra (4):
> >> arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
> >> numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> >> riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> >> riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >>
> >> Greentime Hu (1):
> >> riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> >> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 48 +----------------
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 12 -----
> >> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> >> arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 ++++++++++-
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 +++-
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> >> arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> >> drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> >> drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> >> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 27 ++++++++--
> >> include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> >> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (96%)
> >> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-riscv mailing list
> >> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> > Hey Palmer,
> > I did not see this series in for-next. Let me know if you need
> > anything else to be done for this series.
>
> Sorry about that.  It's on for-next, with Randy's comment addressed.  There was
> one merge conflict: we don't have resource_init() in for-next yet (which I
> think means I missed something else).

resource_init is changed to init_resource and moved to setup.c in the
following patch which was merged in 5.11 MW.
00ab027a3b82 RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree

IDK if that's necessary for the NUMA
> stuff, I just dropped it.  I haven't tested this yet.



-- 
Regards,
Atish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists