[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD56B7fYivPF33BhXWDPskYqNE5jRxd-sA=6+ushNXhyiCrwiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:45:54 -0500
From: Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@...il.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: net: macb: can macb use __napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of __napi_schedule()
Hello, recently I was doing a lot of tracing/profiling to understand
an issue we were having. Anyway, during this I ran across
__napi_schedule_irqoff() where the comment in dev.c says "Variant of
__napi_schedule() assuming hard irqs are masked".
It looks like the queue_writel(queue, IDR, bp->rx_intr_mask); call
just before the __napi_schedule() call in macb_main.c is doing this
hard irq masking? So could it change to be like this?
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c
@@ -1616,7 +1623,7 @@ static irqreturn_t macb_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
if (napi_schedule_prep(&queue->napi)) {
netdev_vdbg(bp->dev, "scheduling RX softirq\n");
- __napi_schedule(&queue->napi);
+ __napi_schedule_irqoff(&queue->napi);
}
}
-Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists