[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <161039555572.3147290.9535464378930231049.b4-ty@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:06:02 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add missing return in non-void function
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:28:39 +0000, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> We don't actually care about the value, since the kernel will panic
> before that; but a value should nonetheless be returned, otherwise the
> compiler will complain.
Applied to for-linus/seccomp, thanks!
[1/1] seccomp: Add missing return in non-void function
https://git.kernel.org/kees/c/04b38d012556
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists