linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: should not override buffer lengh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X/wQcwkdSOTkuFBV@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 00:46:43 -0800
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, bvanassche@....org,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: should not override buffer lengh

On 01/11, Can Guo wrote:
> On 2021-01-11 16:15, Avri Altman wrote:
> > > 
> > > Sorry, typo corrected.
> > > 
> > > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > > 
> > > I think the problem is that func ufshcd_read_desc_param() is not
> > > expecting
> > > one access unsupported descriptors on RPMB LU.
> > Correct.
> > This is about wb introducing a new constraint: wb buffer is only
> > allowed in lu 0..7.
> > And this is why, IMHO, the fix should be in ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun,
> > To include param offset, as it is only called in contingency of
> > ufshcd_read_desc_param.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Avri
> 
> Yeah... Fixing it in ufs-sysfs.c also works. Anyways, the math in
> ufshcd_read_desc_param is already complex. Let's fix it somewhere
> close to the source/initiator.

Thank you, Can and Avri.
I think fixing the lun check makese sense. Let me post v2. :)

> 
> Thanks,
> Can Guo.