linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: WB is not allowed in RPMB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB657566F1BB8C808EFBF9FBB9FCAB0@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 09:20:32 +0000
From:   Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>
CC:     "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: WB is not allowed in RPMB_LUN

>  static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
> -               u8 lun)
> +               u8 lun, u8 param_offset)
>  {
>         if (!dev_info || !dev_info->max_lu_supported) {
>                 pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
>                 return false;
>         }
> -
> +       /* WB is not allowed in RPMB_WLUN */
/* wb is only allowed to either a sha*/
> +       if (param_offset == UNIT_DESC_PARAM_WB_BUF_ALLOC_UNITS)
> +               return lun < dev_info->max_lu_supported;
I think here you should use UFS_UPIU_MAX_WB_LUN_ID and not dev_info->max_lu_supported.

Thanks,
Avri