lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111110334.3495674-1-yebin10@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:03:34 +0800
From:   Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
To:     <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_dh_rdac: Avoid crash during rdac_bus_attach

We get follow BUG_ON when rdac scan:
[595952.944297] kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c:427!
[595952.951143] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
......
[595953.251065] Call trace:
[595953.259054]  check_ownership+0xb0/0x118
[595953.269794]  rdac_bus_attach+0x1f0/0x4b0
[595953.273787]  scsi_dh_handler_attach+0x3c/0xe8
[595953.278211]  scsi_dh_add_device+0xc4/0xe8
[595953.282291]  scsi_sysfs_add_sdev+0x8c/0x2a8
[595953.286544]  scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x9fc/0xd00
[595953.291142]  __scsi_scan_target+0x598/0x630
[595953.295395]  scsi_scan_target+0x120/0x130
[595953.299481]  fc_user_scan+0x1a0/0x1c0 [scsi_transport_fc]
[595953.304944]  store_scan+0xb0/0x108
[595953.308420]  dev_attr_store+0x44/0x60
[595953.312160]  sysfs_kf_write+0x58/0x80
[595953.315893]  kernfs_fop_write+0xe8/0x1f0
[595953.319888]  __vfs_write+0x60/0x190
[595953.323448]  vfs_write+0xac/0x1c0
[595953.326836]  ksys_write+0x74/0xf0
[595953.330221]  __arm64_sys_write+0x24/0x30

BUG_ON code is in check_ownership:
                list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &h->ctlr->dh_list, node) {
                        /* h->sdev should always be valid */
                        BUG_ON(!tmp->sdev);
                        tmp->sdev->access_state = access_state;
                }
rdac_bus_attach
	initialize_controller
		list_add_rcu(&h->node, &h->ctlr->dh_list);
		h->sdev = sdev;
rdac_bus_detach
	list_del_rcu(&h->node);
	h->sdev = NULL;

There is race runing rdac_bus_attach concurrently, maybe we access rdac_dh_data
but h->sdev has not been set.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
index 5efc959493ec..85a71bafaea7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_rdac.c
@@ -453,8 +453,8 @@ static int initialize_controller(struct scsi_device *sdev,
 		if (!h->ctlr)
 			err = SCSI_DH_RES_TEMP_UNAVAIL;
 		else {
-			list_add_rcu(&h->node, &h->ctlr->dh_list);
 			h->sdev = sdev;
+			list_add_rcu(&h->node, &h->ctlr->dh_list);
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&list_lock);
 		err = SCSI_DH_OK;
@@ -778,11 +778,11 @@ static void rdac_bus_detach( struct scsi_device *sdev )
 	spin_lock(&list_lock);
 	if (h->ctlr) {
 		list_del_rcu(&h->node);
-		h->sdev = NULL;
 		kref_put(&h->ctlr->kref, release_controller);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&list_lock);
 	sdev->handler_data = NULL;
+	synchronize_rcu();
 	kfree(h);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ