[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a7de1fedb49489fddf7eac791149f546adccad1.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 03:11:02 -0800
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][v2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Get percpu max freq via
HWP MSR register if available
On Mon, 2021-01-11 at 15:43 +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> Currently when turbo is disabled(either by BIOS or by the user), the
> intel_pstate
> driver reads the max frequency from the package-wide
> MSR_PLATFORM_INFO(0xce) register.
> However on asymmetric platforms it is possible in theory that small
> and big core with
> HWP enabled might have different max cpu frequency
max non-turbo frequency (although code call max_freq).
Thanks,
Srinivas
> , because the MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES
> is percpu scope according to Intel Software Developer Manual.
>
> The turbo max freq is already percpu basis in current code, thus make
> similar change
> to the max non-turbo frequency as well.
>
> Reported-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
> ---
> v2: per Srinivas' suggestion, avoid duplicated assignment of
> max_pstate.
> --
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index bd3dd1be73ba..f2d18991d969 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1725,11 +1725,9 @@ static void
> intel_pstate_max_within_limits(struct cpudata *cpu)
> static void intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
> {
> cpu->pstate.min_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_min();
> - cpu->pstate.max_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_max();
> cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical =
> pstate_funcs.get_max_physical();
> cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_turbo();
> cpu->pstate.scaling = pstate_funcs.get_scaling();
> - cpu->pstate.max_freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu-
> >pstate.scaling;
>
> if (hwp_active && !hwp_mode_bdw) {
> unsigned int phy_max, current_max, guar_state;
> @@ -1737,8 +1735,12 @@ static void
> intel_pstate_get_cpu_pstates(struct cpudata *cpu)
> intel_pstate_get_hwp_max(cpu, &phy_max, ¤t_max,
> &guar_state);
> cpu->pstate.turbo_freq = phy_max * cpu-
> >pstate.scaling;
> cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate = phy_max;
> + cpu->pstate.max_pstate = guar_state;
> + cpu->pstate.max_freq = guar_state * cpu-
> >pstate.scaling;
> } else {
> cpu->pstate.turbo_freq = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate *
> cpu->pstate.scaling;
> + cpu->pstate.max_pstate = pstate_funcs.get_max();
> + cpu->pstate.max_freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * cpu-
> >pstate.scaling;
> }
>
> if (pstate_funcs.get_aperf_mperf_shift)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists