[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210111111711.r2xesydzhq5js2nf@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:47:11 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Bill Mills <bill.mills@...aro.org>, tero.kristo@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] kbuild: Add support to build overlays (%.dtbo)
On 07-01-21, 14:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Viresh's patch is not enough.
>
> We will need to change .gitignore
> and scripts/Makefile.dtbinst as well.
>
> In my understanding, the build rule is completely the same
> between .dtb and .dtbo
> As Rob mentioned, I am not sure if we really need/want
> a separate extension.
>
> A counter approach is to use an extension like '.ovl.dtb'
> It clarifies it is an overlay fragment without changing
> anything in our build system or the upstream DTC project.
By the time you gave feedback, I have already sent the dtbo change for
DTC to the device-tree-compiler list (based on Rob's suggestion).
And it got merged today by David:
https://github.com/dgibson/dtc/commit/163f0469bf2ed8b2fe5aa15bc796b93c70243ddc
Can we please finalize what we need to do with naming here and be done
with it, so I can rework my patches and get going ?
Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists