[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c37f8618-5100-4087-3bc3-fe421d40f3b8@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:50:40 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] i2c: tegra: Fix i2c_writesl() to use writel() instead
of writesl()
20.10.2020 19:37, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>
> On 10/20/20 12:48 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:03:54PM -0700, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>> VI I2C don't have DMA support and uses PIO mode all the time.
>>>
>>> Current driver uses writesl() to fill TX FIFO based on available
>>> empty slots and with this seeing strange silent hang during any I2C
>>> register access after filling TX FIFO with 8 words.
>>>
>>> Using writel() followed by i2c_readl() in a loop to write all words
>>> to TX FIFO instead of using writesl() helps for large transfers in
>>> PIO mode.
>>>
>>> So, this patch updates i2c_writesl() API to use writel() in a loop
>>> instead of writesl().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 9 ++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>> index 6f08c0c..274bf3a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>> @@ -333,10 +333,13 @@ static u32 i2c_readl(struct tegra_i2c_dev
>>> *i2c_dev, unsigned int reg)
>>> return readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base +
>>> tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg));
>>> }
>>> -static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data,
>>> +static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 *data,
>>> unsigned int reg, unsigned int len)
>>> {
>>> - writesl(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg), data,
>>> len);
>>> + while (len--) {
>>> + writel(*data++, i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev,
>>> reg));
>>> + i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_STATUS);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> static void i2c_readsl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void *data,
>>> @@ -811,7 +814,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct
>>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>>> i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining;
>>> i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf + words_to_transfer *
>>> BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;
>>> - i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, buf, I2C_TX_FIFO, words_to_transfer);
>>> + i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, (u32 *)buf, I2C_TX_FIFO,
>>> words_to_transfer);
>> I've thought a bit more about this and I wonder if we're simply reading
>> out the wrong value for tx_fifo_avail and therefore end up overflowing
>> the TX FIFO. Have you checked what the value is for tx_fifo_avail when
>> this silent hang occurs? Given that this is specific to the VI I2C I'm
>> wondering if this is perhaps a hardware bug where we read the wrong TX
>> FIFO available count.
>>
>> Thierry
>
> Yes FIFO status shows all 8 slots available.
Please explain how you checked that 8 slots are available, provide
example code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists