linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] rcu/nocb: Trigger self-IPI on late deferred wake up before user resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X/w+yJmCBnDWxtoE@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:04:24 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] rcu/nocb: Trigger self-IPI on late deferred wake
 up before user resume

On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:05:32AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Entering RCU idle mode may cause a deferred wake up of an RCU NOCB_GP
> kthread (rcuog) to be serviced.
> 
> Unfortunately the call to rcu_user_enter() is already past the last
> rescheduling opportunity before we resume to userspace or to guest mode.
> We may escape there with the woken task ignored.
> 
> The ultimate resort to fix every callsites is to trigger a self-IPI
> (nohz_full depends on IRQ_WORK) that will trigger a reschedule on IRQ
> tail or guest exit.
> 
> Eventually every site that want a saner treatment will need to carefully
> place a call to rcu_nocb_flush_deferred_wakeup() before the last explicit
> need_resched() check upon resume.
> 
> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Fixes: 96d3fd0d315a (rcu: Break call_rcu() deadlock involving scheduler and perf)
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar<mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c        | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h        |  2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index b6e1377774e3..2920dfc9f58c 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@ -676,6 +676,18 @@ void rcu_idle_enter(void)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_idle_enter);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> +
> +/*
> + * An empty function that will trigger a reschedule on
> + * IRQ tail once IRQs get re-enabled on userspace resume.
> + */
> +static void late_wakeup_func(struct irq_work *work)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_work, late_wakeup_work) =
> +	IRQ_WORK_INIT(late_wakeup_func);
> +
>  /**
>   * rcu_user_enter - inform RCU that we are resuming userspace.
>   *
> @@ -692,9 +704,17 @@ noinstr void rcu_user_enter(void)
>  	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> -	do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(rdp);
> +	/*
> +	 * We may be past the last rescheduling opportunity in the entry code.
> +	 * Trigger a self IPI that will fire and reschedule once we resume to
> +	 * user/guest mode.
> +	 */
> +	if (do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(rdp) && need_resched())
> +		irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&late_wakeup_work));
> +
>  	rcu_eqs_enter(true);
>  }

Do we have the guarantee that every architecture that supports NOHZ_FULL
has arch_irq_work_raise() on?

Also, can't you do the same thing you did earlier and do that wakeup
thing before we complete exit_to_user_mode_prepare() ?