linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3328: Add Radxa ROCK Pi E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:27:47 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
To:     Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3328: Add Radxa ROCK Pi E

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:06 AM Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, 10. Januar 2021, 16:37:15 CET schrieb Chen-Yu Tsai:
> > > > +     vcc_sd: sdmmc-regulator {
> > > > +             compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > > > +             gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PD6 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > > > +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > +             pinctrl-0 = <&sdmmc0m1_pin>;
> > >
> > > > +             regulator-boot-on;
> > > > +             regulator-name = "vcc_sd";
> > >
> > > regulator-name above other regulator properties
> >
> > That is actually what I was used to, but some other rockchip dts files
> > have all the properties sorted alphabetically. So I stuck with what I
> > saw.
>
> I try to keep it alphabetical except for the exceptions :-D .
>
> regulator-name is such an exception. Similar to compatibles, the
> regulator-name is an entry needed to see if you're at the right node,
> so I really like it being the topmost regulator-foo property - just makes
> reading easier.
>
> (same for the compatible first, then regs, interrupts parts, as well
> as "status-last")
>
> But oftentimes, I just fix the ordering when applying - but seem to have
> missed this somewhere in those "other Rockchip dts files" ;-) .

I was slightly confused. I looked again and yes regulator-name is always the
first regulator related property. What's off is that in some cases min/max
voltage comes before always-on/boot-on, and in others vice versa.

For example in the Rock64 and ROC-RK3328-CC device trees, in the fixed
regulators, always-on/boot-on come before min/max voltage, while in the
PMIC the other order is used.


ChenYu