[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/25ssA2scFSu+3/@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:01:06 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 Maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: PM: Register syscore_ops for scale invariance
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 07:05:59PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> On x86 scale invariace tends to be disabled during resume from
> suspend-to-RAM, because the MPERF or APERF MSR values are not as
> expected then due to updates taking place after the platform
> firmware has been invoked to complete the suspend transition.
>
> That, of course, is not desirable, especially if the schedutil
> scaling governor is in use, because the lack of scale invariance
> causes it to be less reliable.
>
> To counter that effect, modify init_freq_invariance() to register
> a syscore_ops object for scale invariance with the ->resume callback
> pointing to init_counter_refs() which will run on the CPU starting
> the resume transition (the other CPUs will be taken care of the
> "online" operations taking place later).
>
> Fixes: e2b0d619b400 ("x86, sched: check for counters overflow in frequency invariant accounting")
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Thanks!, I'll take it through the sched/urgent tree?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists