| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9ecfbc2e-5f33-dd3c-0c3b-ee7c463b3e68@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:46:31 +0530
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
<sudeep.holla@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: Enable SMC conduit
On 1/5/2021 10:27 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Given that most arm64 platform's PCI implementations needs quirks
> to deal with problematic config accesses, this is a good place to
> apply a firmware abstraction. The ARM PCI SMMCCC spec details a
> standard SMC conduit designed to provide a simple PCI config
> accessor. This specification enhances the existing ACPI/PCI
> abstraction and expects power, config, etc functionality is handled
> by the platform. It also is very explicit that the resulting config
> space registers must behave as is specified by the pci specification.
>
> Lets hook the normal ACPI/PCI config path, and when we detect
> missing MADT data, attempt to probe the SMC conduit. If the conduit
> exists and responds for the requested segment number (provided by the
> ACPI namespace) attach a custom pci_ecam_ops which redirects
> all config read/write requests to the firmware.
>
> This patch is based on the Arm PCI Config space access document @
> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0115/latest
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 26 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> index 1006ed2d7c60..56d3773aaa25 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -107,6 +108,90 @@ static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci)
> return status;
> }
>
> +static int smccc_pcie_check_conduit(u16 seg)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + arm_smccc_smc(SMCCC_PCI_VERSION, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + if ((int)res.a0 < 0)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + arm_smccc_smc(SMCCC_PCI_SEG_INFO, seg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + if ((int)res.a0 < 0)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + pr_info("PCI: SMC conduit attached to segment %d\n", seg);
Shouldn't this print be moved towards the end of
pci_acpi_setup_smccc_mapping() API?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int smccc_pcie_config_read(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> + int where, int size, u32 *val)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + devfn |= bus->number << 8;
> + devfn |= bus->domain_nr << 16;
> +
> + arm_smccc_smc(SMCCC_PCI_READ, devfn, where, size, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + if (res.a0) {
> + *val = ~0;
> + return -PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
> + }
> +
> + *val = res.a1;
> + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +}
> +
> +static int smccc_pcie_config_write(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn,
> + int where, int size, u32 val)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + devfn |= bus->number << 8;
> + devfn |= bus->domain_nr << 16;
> +
> + arm_smccc_smc(SMCCC_PCI_WRITE, devfn, where, size, val, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> + if (res.a0)
> + return -PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
> +
> + return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pci_ecam_ops smccc_pcie_ecam_ops = {
> + .bus_shift = 8,
> + .pci_ops = {
> + .read = smccc_pcie_config_read,
> + .write = smccc_pcie_config_write,
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static struct pci_config_window *
> +pci_acpi_setup_smccc_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &root->device->dev;
> + struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary;
> + struct pci_config_window *cfg;
> +
> + cfg = kzalloc(sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cfg)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + cfg->parent = dev;
> + cfg->ops = &smccc_pcie_ecam_ops;
> + cfg->busr.start = bus_res->start;
> + cfg->busr.end = bus_res->end;
> + cfg->busr.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
> +
> + cfg->res.name = "PCI SMCCC";
> + if (cfg->ops->init)
Since there is no init implemented, what is the purpose of having this?
> + cfg->ops->init(cfg);
> + return cfg;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space
> * mapping.
> @@ -125,6 +210,8 @@ pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
>
> ret = pci_mcfg_lookup(root, &cfgres, &ecam_ops);
> if (ret) {
> + if (!smccc_pcie_check_conduit(seg))
> + return pci_acpi_setup_smccc_mapping(root);
> dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR ECAM region not found\n", seg, bus_res);
> return NULL;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> index f860645f6512..327f52533c71 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> @@ -89,6 +89,32 @@
>
> #define SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_RET_UNAFFECTED 1
>
> +/* PCI ECAM conduit */
> +#define SMCCC_PCI_VERSION \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD, 0x0130)
> +
> +#define SMCCC_PCI_FEATURES \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD, 0x0131)
> +
> +#define SMCCC_PCI_READ \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD, 0x0132)
> +
> +#define SMCCC_PCI_WRITE \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD, 0x0133)
> +
> +#define SMCCC_PCI_SEG_INFO \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD, 0x0134)
> +
> /* Paravirtualised time calls (defined by ARM DEN0057A) */
> #define ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES \
> ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists