lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:02:36 +0000
From:   Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>
To:     Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, maz@...nel.org, drjones@...hat.com
Cc:     james.morse@....com, julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
        suzuki.poulose@....com, shuah@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Expose GICR_TYPER.Last for
 userspace

Hi Eric,

On 12/12/20 6:50 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> Commit 23bde34771f1 ("KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Drop the
> reporting of GICR_TYPER.Last for userspace") temporarily fixed
> a bug identified when attempting to access the GICR_TYPER
> register before the redistributor region setting but dropped
> the support of the LAST bit. This patch restores its
> support (if the redistributor region was set) while keeping the
> code safe.

I suppose the reason for emulating GICR_TYPER.Last is for architecture compliance,
right? I think that should be in the commit message.

>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 7 ++++++-
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h             | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index 581f0f490000..2f9ef6058f6e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ static unsigned long vgic_uaccess_read_v3r_typer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  						 gpa_t addr, unsigned int len)
>  {
>  	unsigned long mpidr = kvm_vcpu_get_mpidr_aff(vcpu);
> +	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> +	struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg = vgic_cpu->rdreg;
>  	int target_vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
>  	u64 value;
>  
> @@ -286,7 +288,9 @@ static unsigned long vgic_uaccess_read_v3r_typer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	if (vgic_has_its(vcpu->kvm))
>  		value |= GICR_TYPER_PLPIS;
>  
> -	/* reporting of the Last bit is not supported for userspace */
> +	if (rdreg && (vgic_cpu->rdreg_index == (rdreg->free_index - 1)))
> +		value |= GICR_TYPER_LAST;
> +
>  	return extract_bytes(value, addr & 7, len);
>  }
>  
> @@ -714,6 +718,7 @@ int vgic_register_redist_iodev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	vgic_cpu->rdreg = rdreg;
> +	vgic_cpu->rdreg_index = rdreg->free_index;

What happens if the next redistributor region we register has the base address
adjacent to this one?

I'm really not familiar with the code, but is it not possible to create two
Redistributor regions (via
KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_ADDR(KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST)) where the second
Redistributor region start address is immediately after the last Redistributor in
the preceding region?

Thanks,
Alex
>  
>  	rd_base = rdreg->base + rdreg->free_index * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;
>  
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index a8d8fdcd3723..596c069263a7 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ struct vgic_cpu {
>  	 */
>  	struct vgic_io_device	rd_iodev;
>  	struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg;
> +	u32 rdreg_index;
>  
>  	/* Contains the attributes and gpa of the LPI pending tables. */
>  	u64 pendbaser;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists