[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87blduf0t3.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:49:12 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
<linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] vfs: move cap_convert_nscap() call into vfs_setxattr()
ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> So there is the basic question do we want to read the raw bytes on disk
> or do we want to return something meaningful to the reader. As the
> existing tools use the xattr interface to set/clear fscaps returning
> data to user space rather than raw bytes seems the perfered interface.
>
> My ideal semantics would be:
>
> - If current_user_ns() == sb->s_user_ns return the raw data.
>
> I don't know how to implement this first scenario while permitting
> stacked filesystems.
After a little more thought I do.
In getxattr if the get_cap method is not implemented by the
filesystem if current_user_ns() == sb->s_user_ns simply treat it as
an ordinary xattr read/write.
Otherwise call vfs_get_cap and translate the result as described
below.
The key point of this is it allows for seeing what is actually on
disk (when it is not confusing).
> - Calculate the cpu_vfs_cap_data as get_vfs_caps_from_disk does.
> That gives the meaning of the xattr.
>
> - If "from_kuid(current_userns(), krootid) == 0" return a v2 cap.
>
> - If "rootid_owns_currentns()" return a v2 cap.
>
> - Else return an error. Probably a permission error.
>
> The fscap simply can not make sense to the user if the rootid does not
> map. Return a v2 cap would imply that the caps are present on the
> executable (in the current context) which they are not.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists