lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx-gPA3HeSKS6XW1zYj_imjDH_86897Jub56b9ctBOqmwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:39 -0800
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Vincent Huang <vincent.huang@...synaptics.com>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 5.11-rc device reordering breaks ThinkPad rmi4 suspend

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:42 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> >
> > I happen to have an X1 Carbon (different gen though) lying around and
> > I poked at its /sys folders. None of the devices in the rmi4_smbus are
> > considered the grandchildren of the i2c device. I think the real
> > problem is rmi_register_transport_device() [1] not setting up the
> > parent for any of the new devices it's adding.
> >
> > Hugh, can you try this patch?
>
> Just tried, but no, this patch does not help; but I bet
> you're along the right lines, and something as simple will do it.

Did you see this patch change the organization of devices under /sys/devices/?
The rmi* devices need to be under one of the i2c devices after this
patch. Is that not the case? Or is that the case, but you are still
seeing suspend/resume issues?

-Saravana

>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> > index 24f31a5c0e04..50a0134b6901 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c
> > @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ int rmi_register_transport_device(struct
> > rmi_transport_dev *xport)
> >
> >         rmi_dev->dev.bus = &rmi_bus_type;
> >         rmi_dev->dev.type = &rmi_device_type;
> > +       rmi_dev->dev.parent = xport->dev;
> >
> >         xport->rmi_dev = rmi_dev;
> >
> > -Saravana
> >
> > [1] - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.c#n74

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ