lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:31:23 +0000 From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Long Li <longli@...uxonhyperv.com> CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/3] hv_netvsc: Prevent packet loss during VF add/remove > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] hv_netvsc: Prevent packet loss during VF > add/remove > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 16:53:40 -0800 Long Li wrote: > > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com> > > > > This patch set fixes issues with packet loss on VF add/remove. > > These patches are for net-next? They just optimize the amount of packet > loss on switch, not fix bugs, right? Yes, those patches are for net-next. They eliminate the packet loss introduced from Linux side during VF changes. They can be seen as optimizations.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists