linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3, 07/15] drm/mediatek: enable OVL_LAYER_SMI_ID_EN for multi-layer usecase

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CAAOTY_9_LN8nYSmg42gpR5dLqTe+ABt61WzM8S5cp2D6-rWKyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 07:59:46 +0800
From:   Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
To:     Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3, 07/15] drm/mediatek: enable OVL_LAYER_SMI_ID_EN for
 multi-layer usecase

Hi, Yongqiang:

Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com> 於 2021年1月11日 週一 下午3:44寫道：
>
> enable OVL_LAYER_SMI_ID_EN for multi-layer usecase

Could you describe more information? Without this patch, what would happen?

>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> index b47c238..4934bee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #define DISP_REG_OVL_RST                       0x0014
>  #define DISP_REG_OVL_ROI_SIZE                  0x0020
>  #define DISP_REG_OVL_DATAPATH_CON              0x0024
> +#define OVL_LAYER_SMI_ID_EN                            BIT(0)
>  #define OVL_BGCLR_SEL_IN                               BIT(2)
>  #define DISP_REG_OVL_ROI_BGCLR                 0x0028
>  #define DISP_REG_OVL_SRC_CON                   0x002c
> @@ -61,6 +62,7 @@ struct mtk_disp_ovl_data {
>         unsigned int gmc_bits;
>         unsigned int layer_nr;
>         bool fmt_rgb565_is_0;
> +       bool smi_id_en;
>  };
>
>  /**
> @@ -116,7 +118,17 @@ static void mtk_ovl_disable_vblank(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp)
>
>  static void mtk_ovl_start(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp)
>  {
> +       struct mtk_disp_ovl *ovl = comp_to_ovl(comp);
> +
>         writel_relaxed(0x1, comp->regs + DISP_REG_OVL_EN);
> +
> +       if(ovl->data->smi_id_en) {
> +               unsigned int reg;
> +
> +               reg = readl(comp->regs + DISP_REG_OVL_DATAPATH_CON);
> +               reg = reg | OVL_LAYER_SMI_ID_EN;
> +               writel_relaxed(reg, comp->regs + DISP_REG_OVL_DATAPATH_CON);

I think this setting should before write 1 to DISP_REG_OVL_EN.

> +       }
>  }
>
>  static void mtk_ovl_stop(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp)

Should clear DISP_REG_OVL_DATAPATH_CON when stop?

Regards,
Chun-Kuang.

> --
> 1.8.1.1.dirty
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives