[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx8mNW=skm-2W6tS20wG1BxJW6ROMqDaktN5udKTeZtNrQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:16:37 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Vincent Huang <vincent.huang@...synaptics.com>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 5.11-rc device reordering breaks ThinkPad rmi4 suspend
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:44 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 3:42 PM Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I happen to have an X1 Carbon (different gen though) lying around and
> > > > I poked at its /sys folders. None of the devices in the rmi4_smbus are
> > > > considered the grandchildren of the i2c device. I think the real
> > > > problem is rmi_register_transport_device() [1] not setting up the
> > > > parent for any of the new devices it's adding.
> > > >
> > > > Hugh, can you try this patch?
> > >
> > > Just tried, but no, this patch does not help; but I bet
> > > you're along the right lines, and something as simple will do it.
> >
> > Did you see this patch change the organization of devices under /sys/devices/?
> > The rmi* devices need to be under one of the i2c devices after this
> > patch. Is that not the case? Or is that the case, but you are still
> > seeing suspend/resume issues?
>
> Now that I look, yes, that patch has moved the directory
> /sys/devices/rmi4-00
> to
> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.4/i2c-6/6-002c/rmi4-00
What about child devices of rmi4-00? Does it still have the
rmi4-00.fn* devices as children? I'd think so, but just double
checking.
>
> But I still see the same suspend issues despite that.
Can you please get new logs to see if the failure reasons are still
the same? I'd think this parent/child relationship would at least
avoid the "Failed to read irqs" errors that seem to be due to I2C
dependency.
-Saravana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists