[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/0utdv13PT0ipTs@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:08:05 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Radim Pavlik <radim.pavlik@...-biometrics.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: auo_pixcir_ts - add missing check for gpio
Hi Radim,
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:32:17AM +0100, Radim Pavlik wrote:
> The of_get_gpio() may return error, so check it immediately. The old
> code might fail with EPROBE_DEFER which was masked by the
> folowing gpio_is_valid() and returned EINVAL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Pavlik <radim.pavlik@...-biometrics.com>
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/auo-pixcir-ts.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/auo-pixcir-ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/auo-pixcir-ts.c
> index c33e63ca6142..8f3cfd743bdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/auo-pixcir-ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/auo-pixcir-ts.c
> @@ -479,12 +479,16 @@ static struct auo_pixcir_ts_platdata *auo_pixcir_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> pdata->gpio_int = of_get_gpio(np, 0);
> + if (pdata->gpio_int < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(pdata->gpio_int);
Hmm, while this check might make sense it definitely renders the next
one unnecessary.
BTW, do you have a device that uses this touch panel? This driver could
use more improvements, such as switching to gpiod API and generic device
properties, and dropping the platform data support.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists