linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] arch: x86: kernel: cpu: Takes a letter away and put a semicolon too, to match below stuc member

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:54:17 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
        reinette.chatre@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gustavo@...eddedor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arch: x86: kernel: cpu: Takes a letter away and put a
 semicolon too, to match below stuc member

On 1/11/21 9:27 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> s/kernlfs/kernfs/
> 
>  A semicolon at the end of member name
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> ---
>  As pointed out by Gustavo and Randy in version one of this patch
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> index ee71c47844cb..ef9e2c0809b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/internal.h
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ enum rdtgrp_mode {
> 
>  /**
>   * struct mongroup - store mon group's data in resctrl fs.
> - * @mon_data_kn		kernlfs node for the mon_data directory
> + * @mon_data_kn:		kernfs node for the mon_data directory
>   * @parent:			parent rdtgrp
>   * @crdtgrp_list:		child rdtgroup node list
>   * @rmid:			rmid for this rdtgroup
> --

The patch to internal.h is OK, but as Gustavo pointed out,
the patch versioning isn't done as expected.

-- 
~Randy