[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG_fn=WX5rGMHKPrDVCUoTNFwygW9AP7QrVwrco1R70sZ6MqQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:04:54 +0100
From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] kasan: add match-all tag tests
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 7:28 PM Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Add 3 new tests for tag-based KASAN modes:
>
> 1. Check that match-all pointer tag is not assigned randomly.
> 2. Check that 0xff works as a match-all pointer tag.
> 3. Check that there are no match-all memory tags.
>
> Note, that test #3 causes a significant number (255) of KASAN reports
> to be printed during execution for the SW_TAGS mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I78f1375efafa162b37f3abcb2c5bc2f3955dfd8e
> ---
> lib/test_kasan.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/kasan/kasan.h | 6 ++++
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
> index 46e578c8e842..f1eda0bcc780 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/mman.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> @@ -790,6 +791,95 @@ static void vmalloc_oob(struct kunit *test)
> vfree(area);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check that match-all pointer tag is not assigned randomly for
> + * tag-based modes.
> + */
> +static void match_all_not_assigned(struct kunit *test)
> +{
Do we want to run this test in non-tag-based modes? Probably not?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists