[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9D7ECABD-4964-431E-AF33-AB34F3F35183@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:50:06 +0000
From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
CC: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: add non-BPF_LSM test for task
local storage
> On Jan 11, 2021, at 9:44 AM, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:31 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/8/21 3:19 PM, Song Liu wrote:
>>> Task local storage is enabled for tracing programs. Add a test for it
>>> without CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
>
> Can you also explain what the test does in the commit log?
>
> It would also be nicer to have a somewhat more realistic selftest which
> represents a simple tracing + task local storage use case.
Let me try to make this more realistic.
Thanks,
Song
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists