[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <250496a6-edfb-6a0e-9ca2-f1ceea6a0c8a@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:41:04 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] create hugetlb flags to consolidate state
On 11.01.21 22:01, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> While discussing a series of hugetlb fixes in [1], it became evident
> that the hugetlb specific page state information is stored in a somewhat
> haphazard manner. Code dealing with state information would be easier
> to read, understand and maintain if this information was stored in a
> consistent manner.
>
> This RFC series uses page.private of the hugetlb head page for storing a
> set of hugetlb specific page flags. Routines to manipulate the flags
> are copied from normal page flag manipulation code and use atomic
> operations. This is likely overkill for the uses in hugetlb code, and
> can be changed after additional auditing of code.
Haven't looked into the code but that sounds like a good idea.
>
> For now, only 3 state flags are added as part of this series. However,
> the suggested fix in [2] could use another flag. In addition, a flag
> could be used to track whether or not a huge page has been cleared to
> optimize code paths if the init_on_alloc security feature is enabled.
Right, that will be helpful: indicating pages that were either cleared
directly when allocating (init_on_alloc) or via some asynchronous
mechanism in the future.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists