[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/2RYvDDmMs61Uen@lx-t490>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:09:06 +0100
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@...utronix.de>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@...e.de>,
Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@...el.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, intel-linux-scu@...el.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Sebastian A. Siewior" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/19] scsi: libsas and users: Remove notifier
indirection
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:36:21AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 12/01/2021 11:06, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> > From: John Garry<john.garry@...wei.com>
> >
> > The LLDDs report events to libsas with .notify_port_event and
> > .notify_phy_event callbacks.
> >
> > These callbacks are fixed and so there is no reason why we cannot call the
> > functions directly, so do that.
> >
> > This neatens the code slightly.
> >
> > [a.darwish@...utronix.de: Remove the now unused "sas_ha" local variables]
> > Signed-off-by: John Garry<john.garry@...wei.com>
>
> Don't forget your signed-off-by :)
>
Oh, yes.
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst b/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
> > index f9b77c7879db..a183b1d84713 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/scsi/libsas.rst
> > @@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ num_phys
> > The event interface::
> > /* LLDD calls these to notify the class of an event. */
> > - void (*notify_port_event)(struct sas_phy *, enum port_event);
> > - void (*notify_phy_event)(struct sas_phy *, enum phy_event);
> > + void sas_notify_port_event(struct sas_phy *, enum port_event);
> > + void sas_notify_phy_event(struct sas_phy *, enum phy_event);
> > When sas_register_ha() returns, those are set and can be
> > called by the LLDD to notify the SAS layer of such events
>
> Maybe this was missed in the rebase, but I think that this comment can go/be
> changed at some stage.
>
Yeah, I pulled the patch yesterday from:
https://github.com/hisilicon/kernel-dev/commit/87fcd7e113dc05b7933260e7fa4588dc3730cc2a
Lemme check if there are any other differences.
Thanks,
--
Ahmed S. Darwish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists