linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 29/48] soc/tegra: pmc: Link domains to the parent Core domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrj-8WwK1U7KJaCiWkt2bsohgoEnqhQ4sgwjZzZfX2iMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:30:39 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/48] soc/tegra: pmc: Link domains to the parent Core domain

- trimmed cc-list

On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 19:07, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>
> The Core domain is a parent of PMC power domains, hence PMC domains
> should be set up as a sub-domains of the parent (Core) domain if
> "power-domains" phandle presents in a device-tree node of PMC domain.
>
> This allows to propagate GENPD performance changes to the parent Core
> domain if performance change is applied to PMC domain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> index 4f96dc7745c4..1a659d1c06d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
> @@ -1236,6 +1236,7 @@ static int tegra_powergate_add(struct tegra_pmc *pmc, struct device_node *np)
>  static int tegra_powergate_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
>                                 struct device_node *parent)
>  {
> +       struct of_phandle_args child_args, parent_args;
>         struct device_node *np, *child;
>         int err = 0;
>
> @@ -1249,6 +1250,24 @@ static int tegra_powergate_init(struct tegra_pmc *pmc,
>                         of_node_put(child);
>                         break;
>                 }
> +
> +               if (of_parse_phandle_with_args(child, "power-domains",
> +                                              "#power-domain-cells",
> +                                              0, &parent_args))
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               child_args.np = child;
> +               child_args.args_count = 0;
> +
> +               err = of_genpd_add_subdomain(&parent_args, &child_args);
> +               of_node_put(parent_args.np);
> +               if (err) {
> +                       if (err == -ENOENT)
> +                               err = -EPROBE_DEFER;

Okay. So this special error treatment is needed because
of_genpd_add_subdomain may return -ENOENT, in case the providers for
the parent-domain and child-domain haven't been registered yet.

I suggest we move this into of_genpd_add_subdomain() instead, thus
letting it return -EPROBE_DEFER when there are parent/child nodes
specified in DT, but the providers are lacking.

> +
> +                       of_node_put(child);
> +                       break;
> +               }
>         }
>
>         of_node_put(np);
> --
> 2.29.2
>

Kind regards
Uffe