| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:09:54 +0000
From: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
To: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] media: sunxi-cir: Factor out hardware initialization
Hi Samuel,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:00:20AM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 1/13/21 8:36 AM, Sean Young wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 10:51:31PM -0600, Samuel Holland wrote:
> >> In preparation for adding suspend/resume hooks, factor out the hardware
> >> initialization from the driver probe/remove functions.
> >>
> >> The timeout programmed during init is taken from the `struct rc_dev` so
> >> it is maintained across an exit/init cycle.
> >>
> >> This resolves some trivial issues with the probe function: throwing away
> >> the error from clk_prepare_enable and using the wrong type for the
> >> temporary register value.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c b/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c
> >> index 48be400421cd..ccb9d6b4225d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/rc/sunxi-cir.c
> >> @@ -169,10 +169,74 @@ static int sunxi_ir_set_timeout(struct rc_dev *rc_dev, unsigned int timeout)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static int sunxi_ir_hw_init(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct sunxi_ir *ir = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> + u32 tmp;
> >> + int ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = reset_control_deassert(ir->rst);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(ir->apb_clk);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable apb clk\n");
> >> + goto exit_assert_reset;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(ir->clk);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable ir clk\n");
> >> + goto exit_disable_apb_clk;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* Enable CIR Mode */
> >> + writel(REG_CTL_MD, ir->base + SUNXI_IR_CTL_REG);
> >> +
> >> + /* Set noise threshold and idle threshold */
> >> + sunxi_ir_set_timeout(ir->rc, ir->rc->timeout);
>
> Initializing ir->rc->timeout in .probe is needed because of this line.
> As the changelog mentions, this reprograms the user-configured timeout
> after an exit/init (suspend/resume) cycle. It needs some default value
> the first time, when called from .probe.
Yes, you're completely right. Sorry about that.
> >> +
> >> + /* Invert Input Signal */
> >> + writel(REG_RXCTL_RPPI, ir->base + SUNXI_IR_RXCTL_REG);
> >> +
> >> + /* Clear All Rx Interrupt Status */
> >> + writel(REG_RXSTA_CLEARALL, ir->base + SUNXI_IR_RXSTA_REG);
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * Enable IRQ on overflow, packet end, FIFO available with trigger
> >> + * level
> >> + */
> >> + writel(REG_RXINT_ROI_EN | REG_RXINT_RPEI_EN |
> >> + REG_RXINT_RAI_EN | REG_RXINT_RAL(ir->fifo_size / 2 - 1),
> >> + ir->base + SUNXI_IR_RXINT_REG);
> >> +
> >> + /* Enable IR Module */
> >> + tmp = readl(ir->base + SUNXI_IR_CTL_REG);
> >> + writel(tmp | REG_CTL_GEN | REG_CTL_RXEN, ir->base + SUNXI_IR_CTL_REG);
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> +exit_disable_apb_clk:
> >> + clk_disable_unprepare(ir->apb_clk);
> >> +exit_assert_reset:
> >> + reset_control_assert(ir->rst);
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void sunxi_ir_hw_exit(struct device *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct sunxi_ir *ir = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> +
> >> + clk_disable_unprepare(ir->clk);
> >> + clk_disable_unprepare(ir->apb_clk);
> >> + reset_control_assert(ir->rst);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> static int sunxi_ir_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> int ret = 0;
> >> - unsigned long tmp = 0;
> >>
> >> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> struct device_node *dn = dev->of_node;
> >> @@ -213,43 +277,26 @@ static int sunxi_ir_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> ir->rst = devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(dev, NULL);
> >> if (IS_ERR(ir->rst))
> >> return PTR_ERR(ir->rst);
> >> - ret = reset_control_deassert(ir->rst);
> >> - if (ret)
> >> - return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> ret = clk_set_rate(ir->clk, b_clk_freq);
> >> if (ret) {
> >> dev_err(dev, "set ir base clock failed!\n");
> >> - goto exit_reset_assert;
> >> + return ret;
> >> }
> >> dev_dbg(dev, "set base clock frequency to %d Hz.\n", b_clk_freq);
> >>
> >> - if (clk_prepare_enable(ir->apb_clk)) {
> >> - dev_err(dev, "try to enable apb_ir_clk failed\n");
> >> - ret = -EINVAL;
> >> - goto exit_reset_assert;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - if (clk_prepare_enable(ir->clk)) {
> >> - dev_err(dev, "try to enable ir_clk failed\n");
> >> - ret = -EINVAL;
> >> - goto exit_clkdisable_apb_clk;
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> /* IO */
> >> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> ir->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> >> if (IS_ERR(ir->base)) {
> >> - ret = PTR_ERR(ir->base);
> >> - goto exit_clkdisable_clk;
> >> + return PTR_ERR(ir->base);
> >> }
> >>
> >> ir->rc = rc_allocate_device(RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW);
> >> if (!ir->rc) {
> >> dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate device\n");
> >> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> - goto exit_clkdisable_clk;
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> }
> >>
> >> ir->rc->priv = ir;
> >> @@ -265,6 +312,7 @@ static int sunxi_ir_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> ir->rc->allowed_protocols = RC_PROTO_BIT_ALL_IR_DECODER;
> >> /* Frequency after IR internal divider with sample period in us */
> >> ir->rc->rx_resolution = (USEC_PER_SEC / (b_clk_freq / 64));
> >> + ir->rc->timeout = IR_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
> >
> > Why? This is set from sunxi_ir_set_timeout().
>
> Because it is also sent as an argument to sunxi_ir_set_timeout().
Indeed it is.
> >> ir->rc->min_timeout = sunxi_ithr_to_usec(b_clk_freq, 0);
> >> ir->rc->max_timeout = sunxi_ithr_to_usec(b_clk_freq, 255);
> >> ir->rc->s_timeout = sunxi_ir_set_timeout;
> >> @@ -291,41 +339,15 @@ static int sunxi_ir_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> goto exit_free_dev;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - /* Enable CIR Mode */
> >> - writel(REG_CTL_MD, ir->base+SUNXI_IR_CTL_REG);
> >> -
> >> - /* Set noise threshold and idle threshold */
> >> - sunxi_ir_set_timeout(ir->rc, IR_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT);
>
> This is where the default timeout was originally programmed.
>
> >> -
> >> - /* Invert Input Signal */
> >> - writel(REG_RXCTL_RPPI, ir->base + SUNXI_IR_RXCTL_REG);
> >> -
> >> - /* Clear All Rx Interrupt Status */
> >> - writel(REG_RXSTA_CLEARALL, ir->base + SUNXI_IR_RXSTA_REG);
> >> -
> >> - /*
> >> - * Enable IRQ on overflow, packet end, FIFO available with trigger
> >> - * level
> >> - */
> >> - writel(REG_RXINT_ROI_EN | REG_RXINT_RPEI_EN |
> >> - REG_RXINT_RAI_EN | REG_RXINT_RAL(ir->fifo_size / 2 - 1),
> >> - ir->base + SUNXI_IR_RXINT_REG);
> >> -
> >> - /* Enable IR Module */
> >> - tmp = readl(ir->base + SUNXI_IR_CTL_REG);
> >> - writel(tmp | REG_CTL_GEN | REG_CTL_RXEN, ir->base + SUNXI_IR_CTL_REG);
> >> + ret = sunxi_ir_hw_init(dev);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + goto exit_free_dev;
> >>
> >> dev_info(dev, "initialized sunXi IR driver\n");
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> exit_free_dev:
> >> rc_free_device(ir->rc);
> >> -exit_clkdisable_clk:
> >> - clk_disable_unprepare(ir->clk);
> >> -exit_clkdisable_apb_clk:
> >> - clk_disable_unprepare(ir->apb_clk);
> >> -exit_reset_assert:
> >> - reset_control_assert(ir->rst);
> >>
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> @@ -334,11 +356,9 @@ static int sunxi_ir_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> struct sunxi_ir *ir = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>
> >> - clk_disable_unprepare(ir->clk);
> >> - clk_disable_unprepare(ir->apb_clk);
> >> - reset_control_assert(ir->rst);
> >> -
> >> + sunxi_ir_hw_exit(&pdev->dev);
> >> rc_unregister_device(ir->rc);
>
> I can swap these lines to fix your comment on patch 1.
Please do, and mention it in the commit message.
It might be harmless to write to SUNXI_IR_CIR_REG but it's not really the
right thing to do. It should be idiomatic to call rc_unregister_device()
first in the remove() function.
Thank you for that.
Sean
>
> >> +
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists