[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113153408.GA26690@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:34:08 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Marcus Huewe <suse-tux@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: Remove redundant code in ptrace_attach
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
On 01/13, Marcus Huewe wrote:
>
> In case of a PTRACE_SEIZE request, the PT_SEIZED flag is always set
> at the beginning of ptrace_attach. Hence, there is no need to set
> it again (neither "flags" nor "seize" are modified in between/after
> the initial assignment).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Huewe <suse-tux@....de>
> ---
> kernel/ptrace.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
> index 61db50f7ca86..059fce2ad53c 100644
> --- a/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -402,8 +402,6 @@ static int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *task, long request,
> if (task->ptrace)
> goto unlock_tasklist;
>
> - if (seize)
> - flags |= PT_SEIZED;
> task->ptrace = flags;
>
> ptrace_link(task, current);
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists