[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113165441.GC27045@gaia>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 16:54:41 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kasan, arm64: fix pointer tags in KASAN reports
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:03:30PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> As of the "arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo" patch, the address
> that is passed to report_tag_fault has pointer tags in the format of 0x0X,
> while KASAN uses 0xFX format (note the difference in the top 4 bits).
>
> Fix up the pointer tag before calling kasan_report.
>
> Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I9ced973866036d8679e8f4ae325de547eb969649
> Fixes: dceec3ff7807 ("arm64: expose FAR_EL1 tag bits in siginfo")
> Fixes: 4291e9ee6189 ("kasan, arm64: print report from tag fault handler")
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> index 3c40da479899..a218f6f2fdc8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -304,6 +304,8 @@ static void report_tag_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr,
> {
> bool is_write = ((esr & ESR_ELx_WNR) >> ESR_ELx_WNR_SHIFT) != 0;
>
> + /* The format of KASAN tags is 0xF<x>. */
> + addr |= (0xF0UL << MTE_TAG_SHIFT);
Ah, I see, that top 4 bits are zeroed by do_tag_check_fault(). When this
was added, the only tag faults were generated for user addresses.
Anyway, I'd rather fix it in there based on bit 55, something like (only
compile-tested):
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 3c40da479899..2b71079d2d32 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -709,10 +709,11 @@ static int do_tag_check_fault(unsigned long far, unsigned int esr,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
/*
- * The architecture specifies that bits 63:60 of FAR_EL1 are UNKNOWN for tag
- * check faults. Mask them out now so that userspace doesn't see them.
+ * The architecture specifies that bits 63:60 of FAR_EL1 are UNKNOWN
+ * for tag check faults. Set them to the corresponding bits in the
+ * untagged address.
*/
- far &= (1UL << 60) - 1;
+ far = (untagged_addr(far) & ~MTE_TAG_MASK) | (far & MTE_TAG_MASK) ;
do_bad_area(far, esr, regs);
return 0;
}
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists