[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113173515.GF16960@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:35:15 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/mce: Avoid infinite loop for copy from user
recovery
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 04:32:54PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> I'll work on it. We tend not to have essay length messages as panic() strings. But I can
> add a comment in the code there so that people who grep whatever panic message
> we choose can get more details on what happened and what to do.
I did not mean to write an essay but to simply make it more palatable
for "normal" users. Something like:
"PANIC: Second machine check exception while accessing user data."
or along those lines to explain *why* the machine panics.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists