linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: Mark __kvm_vcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <X/45a2VXX7N5f/rJ@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:06:03 -0800
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: Mark __kvm_vcpu_halt() as static

On Sat, Jan 09, 2021, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> Kernel test robot throws below warning ->
> 
> >> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:7979:5: warning: no previous prototype for
> >> '__kvm_vcpu_halt' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>     7979 | int __kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int state, int
> reason)
>          |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Marking __kvm_vcpu_halt() as static as it is used inside this file.

Paolo beat you to the punch, commit 872f36eb0b0f ("KVM: x86: __kvm_vcpu_halt
can be static").

> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 61499e1..c2fdf14 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@
>  static void __kvm_set_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long rflags);
>  static void store_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  static int sync_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +static int __kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int state, int reason);

FWIW, this forward declaration is unnecessary.

>  struct kvm_x86_ops kvm_x86_ops __read_mostly;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_x86_ops);
> @@ -7976,7 +7977,7 @@ void kvm_arch_exit(void)
>  	kmem_cache_destroy(x86_fpu_cache);
>  }
>  
> -int __kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int state, int reason)
> +static int __kvm_vcpu_halt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int state, int reason)
>  {
>  	++vcpu->stat.halt_exits;
>  	if (lapic_in_kernel(vcpu)) {
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>