[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113173843.19227a86@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:38:43 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: Hui Su <sh_def@....com>, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: use task_current() instead of 'rq->curr == p'
Peter,
This is a simple clean up patch that makes sense to me. Want to take it?
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 01:32:23 +0800
Hui Su <sh_def@....com> wrote:
> We have supplied the macro: 'task_current()', and we should
> all use task_current() instaed of 'rq->curr == p',
> which is more readable.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 2 +-
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index f232305dcefe..3b335be97952 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -2474,7 +2474,7 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> int oldprio)
> {
> - if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) {
> + if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || task_current(rq, p)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
> * This might be too much, but unfortunately
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 0655524700d2..1ca554f10901 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static char *task_group_path(struct task_group *tg)
> static void
> print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - if (rq->curr == p)
> + if (task_current(rq, p))
> SEQ_printf(m, ">R");
> else
> SEQ_printf(m, " %c", task_state_to_char(p));
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 290f9e38378c..c3e3ae76302e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5399,7 +5399,7 @@ static void hrtick_start_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> s64 delta = slice - ran;
>
> if (delta < 0) {
> - if (rq->curr == p)
> + if (task_current(rq, p))
> resched_curr(rq);
> return;
> }
> @@ -10740,7 +10740,7 @@ prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
> * our priority decreased, or if we are not currently running on
> * this runqueue and our priority is higher than the current's
> */
> - if (rq->curr == p) {
> + if (task_current(rq, p)) {
> if (p->prio > oldprio)
> resched_curr(rq);
> } else
> @@ -10873,7 +10873,7 @@ static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> * kick off the schedule if running, otherwise just see
> * if we can still preempt the current task.
> */
> - if (rq->curr == p)
> + if (task_current(rq, p))
> resched_curr(rq);
> else
> check_preempt_curr(rq, p, 0);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 49ec096a8aa1..cd615aace14c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -2317,7 +2317,7 @@ prio_changed_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int oldprio)
> if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
> return;
>
> - if (rq->curr == p) {
> + if (task_current(rq, p)) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /*
> * If our priority decreases while running, we
Powered by blists - more mailing lists