lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:39:57 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubsan: Implement __ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption

On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 5:31 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 08:39:52AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Nathan,
> >
> > I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on 7c53f6b671f4aba70ff15e1b05148b10d58c2837]
> >
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nathan-Chancellor/ubsan-Implement-__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption/20210113-055714
> > base:    7c53f6b671f4aba70ff15e1b05148b10d58c2837
> > config: arm64-randconfig-r031-20210112 (attached as .config)
> > compiler: clang version 12.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 32bcfcda4e28375e5a85268d2acfabcfcc011abf)
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
> >         # apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
> >         # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/775adad26a60878926c0ee6cd460a1375bbe51e6
> >         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> >         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Nathan-Chancellor/ubsan-Implement-__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption/20210113-055714
> >         git checkout 775adad26a60878926c0ee6cd460a1375bbe51e6
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=arm64
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >    lib/ubsan.c:192:6: warning: no previous prototype for function '__ubsan_handle_add_overflow' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >    void __ubsan_handle_add_overflow(void *data,
> >         ^
> >    lib/ubsan.c:192:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> >    void __ubsan_handle_add_overflow(void *data,
> >    ^
> >    static
> >    lib/ubsan.c:200:6: warning: no previous prototype for function '__ubsan_handle_sub_overflow' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >    void __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow(void *data,
> >         ^
> >    lib/ubsan.c:200:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
> >    void __ubsan_handle_sub_overflow(void *data,
> >    ^
>
> Given that these are compiler inserted functions, there is not much of a
> point to having prototypes to them. If people feel shutting these
> warnings up is worthwhile, we can just add the prototypes right above
> the function definition in a follow up patch.

Same as stpcpy; it would be nice though. ;)
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ