Message-ID: <3fc2b0174965ec6b911ab4bd73da1525@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:12:28 +0530
From:   Bharat Gooty <bharat.gooty@...adcom.com>
To:     Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Bharat Gooty <bharat.gooty@...adcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: broadcom: clear the warnings caused by
 empty dma-ranges

Hello Ray,

I had cross checked with Design and integration team.
Yes we can set the "dma-rages" to 40 bit DMA ranges. Tested, it is working.

Thanks,
-Bharat

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 2:28 AM
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>; Bharat Gooty
<bharat.gooty@...adcom.com>; devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>;
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>;
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>; Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>;
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>; Andy Gross
<agross@...nel.org>; Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>; Rob
Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; bcm-kernel-feedback-list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>; Zhen Lei
<thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>; linux-arm-kernel
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: dts: broadcom: clear the warnings caused
by empty dma-ranges



On 1/12/2021 12:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 7:28 PM Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com> wrote:
>> On 2020-12-15 7:49 a.m., Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 4:41 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/15/2020 5:19 AM, Bharat Gooty wrote:
>>>>> Since the IOMMU is disabled and DMA engine is on 32-bit bus, We can
>>>>> not
>>>>> give the complete DDR for the USB DMA.
>>>>> So restricting the usable DAM size to 4GB.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, can you make this a proper patch submission along with a Fixes:
>>>> tag that is:
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 2013a4b684b6 ("arm64: dts: broadcom: clear the warnings caused
>>>> by
>>>> empty dma-ranges")
>>>
>>> Yes, that would be helpful, though I would appreciate a better
>>> description
>>> that explains what is actually going on: is it the device or the bus
>>> that
>>> has the 32-bit limitation, and if it is indeed a bug in the device, why
>>> do
>>> you pretend that this is a 64-bit device on a 32-bit bus instead (this
>>> could also use a comment in the dts file)?
>>>
>>>         Arnd
>>>
>>
>> Sorry for the delay in reply. Bharat finally got time to do some
>> investigation to confirm the following:
>>
>> These USB controllers indeed can address 64-bit. However, on the bus
>> internally, only 40-bits are connected to the interconnect of CCN. As a
>> result, the 'dma-ranges' should be modified to address 40-bit in size.
>
> a 40-bit range is effectively the same as a 64-bit range though, so I
> think you'll still need a driver quirk if the device cannot use the whole
> 40
> bit addressing but is limited to 32 bits because of a bug in its dma
> engine.
>

Bharat can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think we have a bug in
the USB DMA engine that causes it can only address 32-bit. I believe we
can set dma-ranges size to 40-bit here.

The dma-range property is though required to be specified, instead of
leaving it as empty, with the use of IOMMU. That seems to be a v5.10
specific behavior as I described below.

Thanks,

Ray

>> We also have a somewhat related question, is it true that since v5.10,
>> defining of 'dma-ranges' on the bus node where its child device node has
>> implication of IOMMU usage (through 'iommus' or 'iommu-map') is now
>> mandatory? My understanding is that the 'dma-ranges' in this scheme will
>> define the IOVA address to system address mapping required by all
>> devices on that bus. Please help to confirm if my understanding is
>> correct
>
> I have not actually seen that change. In general, you should always
> have a dma-ranges property in the parent of a DMA master, I think
> we just never enforced that and fall back to a 32-bit mask by default.
>
>       Arnd
>

-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4166 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists