linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Free unused swap cache page in write protection fault handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC=cRTNMN5Pmz2PC8p3N2-uJkqLUCW95wr=VWTZmodoECmj6nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:24:07 +0800
From:   huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Free unused swap cache page in write protection fault handler

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:12 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:08:56AM +0800, huang ying wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 10:47 AM Linus Torvalds
> > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 6:43 PM Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So in this patch, at the end of wp_page_copy(), the old unused swap
> > > > cache page will be tried to be freed.
> > >
> > > I'd much rather free it later when needed, rather than when you're in
> > > a COW section.
> >
> > Unused swap cache isn't unused file cache.  Nobody can reuse them
> > directly before freeing them firstly.  It will make COW a little
> > faster via keeping them.  But I think the overhead to free them isn't
> > high.  While keeping them in system will confuse users (users will
> > expect file cache to use free memory, but not expect unused swap cache
> > to use much free memory), make the swap space more fragmented, and add
> > system overall overhead (scanning LRU list, etc.).
>
> Couldn't we just move it to the tail of the LRU list so it's reclaimed
> first?  Or is locking going to be a problem here?

Yes.  That's a way to reduce the disturbance to the page reclaiming.
For LRU lock contention, is it sufficient to use another pagevec?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying