linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] drm/sun4i: tcon: fix inverted DCLK polarity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f74a69d0-079b-69a2-98fc-65aabc69daef@benettiengineering.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 11:48:37 +0100
From:   Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ettiengineering.com>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc:     Marjan Pascolo <marjan.pascolo@...xom.it>, wens@...e.org,
        daniel@...ll.ch, airlied@...ux.ie, treding@...dia.com,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/sun4i: tcon: fix inverted DCLK polarity

On 1/13/21 10:42 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 06:46:16PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
>>
>> During commit 88bc4178568b ("drm: Use new
>> DRM_BUS_FLAG_*_(DRIVE|SAMPLE)_(POS|NEG)EDGE flags") DRM_BUS_FLAG_*
>> macros have been changed to avoid ambiguity but just because of this
>> ambiguity previous DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_(POS/NEG)EDGE were used meaning
>> _SAMPLE_ not _DRIVE_. This leads to DLCK inversion and need to fix but
>> instead of swapping phase values, let's adopt an easier approach Maxime
>> suggested:
>> It turned out that bit 26 of SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_REG is dedicated to
>> invert DCLK polarity and this makes things really easier than before. So
>> let's handle DCLK polarity by adding SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_POSITIVE as
>> bit 26 and activating according to bus_flags the same way it is done for
>> all the other signals polarity.
>>
>> Fixes: 88bc4178568b ("drm: Use new DRM_BUS_FLAG_*_(DRIVE|SAMPLE)_(POS|NEG)EDGE flags")
>> Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 20 +-------------------
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.h |  1 +
>>   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> index eaaf5d70e352..30171ccd87e5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
>> @@ -569,26 +569,8 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
>>   	if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_DE_LOW)
>>   		val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DE_NEGATIVE;
>>   
>> -	/*
>> -	 * On A20 and similar SoCs, the only way to achieve Positive Edge
>> -	 * (Rising Edge), is setting dclk clock phase to 2/3(240°).
>> -	 * By default TCON works in Negative Edge(Falling Edge),
>> -	 * this is why phase is set to 0 in that case.
>> -	 * Unfortunately there's no way to logically invert dclk through
>> -	 * IO_POL register.
>> -	 * The only acceptable way to work, triple checked with scope,
>> -	 * is using clock phase set to 0° for Negative Edge and set to 240°
>> -	 * for Positive Edge.
>> -	 * On A33 and similar SoCs there would be a 90° phase option,
>> -	 * but it divides also dclk by 2.
>> -	 * Following code is a way to avoid quirks all around TCON
>> -	 * and DOTCLOCK drivers.
>> -	 */
>>   	if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_POSEDGE)
>> -		clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 240);
>> -
>> -	if (info->bus_flags & DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_DRIVE_NEGEDGE)
>> -		clk_set_phase(tcon->dclk, 0);
>> +		val |= SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_POSITIVE;
>>   
>>   	regmap_update_bits(tcon->regs, SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_REG,
>>   			   SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_HSYNC_POSITIVE |
> 
> You need to add SUN4I_TCON0_IO_POL_DCLK_POSITIVE to the mask you're
> going to change here too

Ah, lost it during squash, I send a v4.

Thank you
Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas